Pular para o conteúdo

Tarefa qrdata_socsci.391

qrdata_socsciagentT2publicépoca 1, tentativa 1Execução: 20261015T170010Z-suite-qrdata_socsci-scripted-7912b3

Veredito

passouPassou em todas as verificações obrigatórias.

Família do método (das chamadas de ferramentas): Regressão linear por mínimos quadrados ordinários (MQO) · infer.ols (ols · regressão linear)

Calculado pelo agente
coef.d.comp =0,6603810.6603814567765842
Coefficient on d.comp in the regression of d_margin
via infer.ols (call_736e4030)
Valor esperado (gabarito)
coef.d.comp =[0.6402,0.6798000000000001]
QRData benchmark/QRData.json at de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed (Xiao Liu, Zirui Wu, Xueqing Wu, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yansong Feng. Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 9215-9235.)
Como foi validado
2 de 2 verificações obrigatórias aprovadas
interval · [0.6402, 0.6798000000000001] ()

Pergunta feita ao analista

Fit a linear regression model using the Democratic margin in the two-party vote share as the response variable and the perceived competence for Democratic candidates as the predictor. What is the estimated slope of the model? Please round to the nearest thousandth.

Resposta

Estimativa (infer.ols): coef.d.comp = 0,6604. Caminho de referência inferido à mão.

Como o agente resolveu e como foi validado

Resumo passo a passo do que o agente executou, por que o caminho está correto e como cada verificação conferiu o resultado.

  1. 1Preparação da base de dados
    face— Several psychologists have reported the intriguing result of an experiment showing that facial appearance predicts election outcomes better than chance. In their experiment, the researchers briefly showed student subjects the black-and-white head shots of two candidates from a US congressional election (winner and runner-up). The exposure of subjects to facial pictures lasted less than a second, and the subjects were then asked to evaluate the two candidates in terms of their perceived competence. The researchers used these competence measures to predict election outcomes. The key hypothesis is whether or not a within-a-second evaluation of facial appearance can predict election outcomes. The CSV data set, face.csv, contains the data from the experiment. Note that we include data only from subjects who did not know the candidates’ political parties, their policies, or even which candidate was the incumbent or challenger. They were simply making snap judgments about which candidate appeared more competent based on their facial expression alone. Variable Description congress: session of Congress year: year of the election state: state of the election winner: name of the winner loser: name of the runner-up w.party: party of the winner l.party: party of the loser d.votes: number of votes for the Democratic candidate r.votes: number of votes for the Republican candidate d.comp: competence measure for the Democratic candidate r.comp: competence measure for the Republican candidate
    face_margin
    Transformação "derive" aplicada à base "face_margin" (119 → 119 linhas). {"args":{"left":"d.votes","right":"r.votes"},"name":"d_minus_r","op":"diff"}
    Transformação "derive" aplicada à base "face_margin" (119 → 119 linhas). {"args":{"columns":["d.votes","r.votes"]},"name":"two_party","op":"sum"}
    Transformação "derive" aplicada à base "face_margin" (119 → 119 linhas). {"args":{"left":"d_minus_r","right":"two_party"},"name":"d_margin","op":"ratio"}
  2. 2Chamada que gerou a resposta finalinfer.ols(Regressão linear por mínimos quadrados ordinários (MQO))citada na respostacoincide com a referência
    Ver chamada call_736e4030 nos detalhes

    OLS of the Democratic two-party margin on the Democratic candidate's perceived competence.

    Por que este é o caminho de referência: OLS of the Democratic two-party margin on the Democratic candidate's perceived competence.
    Argumentos principais
    dataset:
    "face_margin"
    intercept:
    true
    level:
    0,950.95
    se:
    "HC1"
    x:
    ["d.comp"]
    y:
    "d_margin"
    Resultado calculado
    • coef.d.comp = 0,660381 0.6603814567765842
      Coefficient on d.comp in the regression of d_margin
    Diagnósticos: n_obs = 119119 (observations used) · k = 22 (parameters estimated, fixed-effect dummies included) · r2 = 0,1872940.18729363431996082 · df_resid = 117117 · se_type = "HC1" (heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors (HC1))
  3. 3Conferência de lastro e resposta final

    Todos os 1 números escritos na resposta foram conferidos contra as ferramentas e o enunciado (nenhum número sem lastro).

    Números encontrados: 0,6604
    Figuras citadas: call_736e4030:coef.d.comp
    • #0resposta com lastro
      every number of the answer is stated by a tool call
    • #1figura da resposta próxima
      QRData eval.py: strictly inside gold ± 3% (a '%' gold divided by 100), on the answer figure after meta.answer_format

Aprofundamento técnico para especialistas

Acesso direto às fontes primárias, tabela formal de verificações, comparação de argumentos, trajetória completa com prompts brutos e somas SHA-256.

Valores esperados e de onde vêm

qrdata.gold.391

Fonte
QRData benchmark/QRData.json at de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed (Xiao Liu, Zirui Wu, Xueqing Wu, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yansong Feng. Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 9215-9235.)
Tipo
benchmark_gold
Localização
QRData.json item 391 (0-based), field 'answer'
Trecho
item 391 answer 0.660
Valor como publicado
0.660
Valor
0,660.66
Conferido por
arquivo do benchmark
sha256 da cópia lida
e076d960f19434adf728aab70480ce34808c06066fcea48eaa38b145d1a111a1 (identifica a cópia lida, não um arquivo canônico)
Endereço
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xxxiaol/QRData/de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed/benchmark/QRData.json
Licença
CC BY-NC 4.0
  • #1 figura da resposta próxima: [0.6402,0.6798000000000001] · interval · [0.6402, 0.6798000000000001] ()

qrdata.eval_py

Fonte
QRData benchmark/eval.py at de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed (Xiao Liu, Zirui Wu, Xueqing Wu, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yansong Feng. Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 9215-9235.)
Tipo
software
Localização
benchmark/eval.py: extract_first_number, calc_acc
Valor
—
Conferido por
arquivo do benchmark · Vendored byte for byte as suites/data/qrdata_socsci/vendor/benchmark_eval.py.txt; a parity test runs its functions against MAGI's port and the answer_figure_close check.
Implementação
independente da ferramenta
sha256 da cópia lida
d6e5c1f7535ac9413951996c15544beb6f184244acb2da56e1fcd0942837e33d (identifica a cópia lida, não um arquivo canônico)
Endereço
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xxxiaol/QRData/de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed/benchmark/eval.py
Licença
CC BY-NC 4.0
    Especificação técnica do gabarito

    QRData gold: benchmark/QRData.json item 391 at de450af45ff7101b328bb064c6b475f73414a7ed

    Verificações

    Cada verificação, o que esperava, o que observou e a chamada que leu
    #VerificaçãoObrigatóriaResultadoEsperadoObservadoTolerânciaFonteChamada
    0
    resposta com lastro
    every number of the answer is stated by a tool call
    every number backed
    obrigatóriapassou0 sem lastro0 sem lastro[]———
    1
    figura da resposta próxima
    QRData eval.py: strictly inside gold ± 3% (a '%' gold divided by 100), on the answer figure after meta.answer_format
    0.66 in (0.6402, 0.6798)?
    obrigatóriapassou[0.6402,0.6798000000000001]0,660.66interval · [0.6402, 0.6798000000000001] ()qrdata.gold.391call_736e4030

    Caminho de referência e caminho do agente

    A chamada de referência ao lado da chamada que deu a resposta, argumento por argumento.

    caminho de referência do item · hand_inferred

    Referência: infer.olsChamada do agente: infer.ols (call_736e4030)igual
    Argumentos da referência e do agente
    ArgumentoReferênciaAgente
    cluster——não fixado pela referência
    controls—[]não fixado pela referência
    dataset"face_margin""face_margin"igual
    fe—[]não fixado pela referência
    intercept—truenão fixado pela referência
    level—0,950.95não fixado pela referência
    se—"HC1"não fixado pela referência
    subset——não fixado pela referência
    weights——não fixado pela referência
    x["d.comp"]["d.comp"]igual
    y"d_margin""d_margin"igual

    Trajetória

    Cada evento na ordem em que aconteceu: turnos do modelo, chamadas de ferramentas, guardas, transformações e pontuação.

    1. 0Início

      Fit a linear regression model using the Democratic margin in the two-party vote share as the response variable and the perceived competence for Democratic candidates as the predictor. What is the estimated slope of the model? Please round to the nearest thousandth.

      face (agent)

      Several psychologists have reported the intriguing result of an experiment showing that facial appearance predicts election outcomes better than chance. In their experiment, the researchers briefly showed student subjects the black-and-white head shots of two candidates from a US congressional election (winner and runner-up). The exposure of subjects to facial pictures lasted less than a second, and the subjects were then asked to evaluate the two candidates in terms of their perceived competence. The researchers used these competence measures to predict election outcomes. The key hypothesis is whether or not a within-a-second evaluation of facial appearance can predict election outcomes. The CSV data set, face.csv, contains the data from the experiment. Note that we include data only from subjects who did not know the candidates’ political parties, their policies, or even which candidate was the incumbent or challenger. They were simply making snap judgments about which candidate appeared more competent based on their facial expression alone. Variable Description congress: session of Congress year: year of the election state: state of the election winner: name of the winner loser: name of the runner-up w.party: party of the winner l.party: party of the loser d.votes: number of votes for the Democratic candidate r.votes: number of votes for the Republican candidate d.comp: competence measure for the Democratic candidate r.comp: competence measure for the Republican candidate

      file 3c3a97cca6fdd96f6856f7856b5f8bc786a31d1a9be78c9f610ef3070783e970 · frame —
      face_margin (reference)
      file 3c3a97cca6fdd96f6856f7856b5f8bc786a31d1a9be78c9f610ef3070783e970 · frame —
      1. derive {"args":{"left":"d.votes","right":"r.votes"},"name":"d_minus_r","op":"diff"}
      2. derive {"args":{"columns":["d.votes","r.votes"]},"name":"two_party","op":"sum"}
      3. derive {"args":{"left":"d_minus_r","right":"two_party"},"name":"d_margin","op":"ratio"}
    2. 1Transformação
      face_margin · derive {"args":{"left":"d.votes","right":"r.votes"},"name":"d_minus_r","op":"diff"}
      119 → 119 linhas
      Frame antes → depois: 34b60d8b2348 → d30e42c7976f
    3. 2Transformação
      face_margin · derive {"args":{"columns":["d.votes","r.votes"]},"name":"two_party","op":"sum"}
      119 → 119 linhas
      Frame antes → depois: d30e42c7976f → 122bcc68db7b
    4. 3Transformação
      face_margin · derive {"args":{"left":"d_minus_r","right":"two_party"},"name":"d_margin","op":"ratio"}
      119 → 119 linhas
      Frame antes → depois: 122bcc68db7b → 4e22178635b2
    5. 4Turno do modelo
      call_0f86b602referenceFim: tool_use0 ms0 de entrada · 0 de saída · 0 de raciocínio · 0 em cache
      Texto visível

      OLS of the Democratic two-party margin on the Democratic candidate's perceived competence.

      Chamadas pedidas
      • infer.ols
        {
          "dataset": "face_margin",
          "x": [
            "d.comp"
          ],
          "y": "d_margin"
        }
    6. 5Ferramenta
      infer.ols— Regressão linear por mínimos quadrados ordinários (MQO)v0.1.0call_736e4030decidido pelo modeloreexecutável

      Motivo: OLS of the Democratic two-party margin on the Democratic candidate's perceived competence.

      Argumentos
      {
        "cluster": null,
        "controls": [],
        "dataset": "face_margin",
        "fe": [],
        "intercept": true,
        "level": 0.95,
        "se": "HC1",
        "subset": null,
        "weights": null,
        "x": [
          "d.comp"
        ],
        "y": "d_margin"
      }
      Figuras call_736e4030
      ChaveValorValor brutoErro-padrãoIC
      coef.d.comp
      Coefficient on d.comp in the regression of d_margin
      0,6603810.66038145677658420,1251750.125175145682386940,412479 – 0,908284
      Diagnósticos
      • n_obs = 119119 (observations used)
      • k = 22 (parameters estimated, fixed-effect dummies included)
      • r2 = 0,1872940.18729363431996082
      • df_resid = 117117
      • se_type = "HC1" (heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors (HC1))
      • n_clusters = — (errors not clustered)
      Derivação matemática e pressupostos
      coef.d.comp
      1. Coeficiente de d.comp na regressão por mínimos quadrados ordinários de d_margin.→ 0,660381 (0.6603814567765842)
      2. Erro-padrão robusto à heterocedasticidade (HC1): a raiz da variância estimada do coeficiente.ep = √V_jj→ 0,125175 (0.12517514568238694)
      3. Intervalo de 95% de confiança: a estimativa mais ou menos o valor crítico da distribuição t de Student com 117 graus de liberdade vezes o erro-padrão.IC = β ± c · ep
      Pressupostos do estimador
      • the conditional mean of the outcome is linear in the regressors
      • errors are independent across observations; their variance may differ
      Tabelas (1)
      {
        "coefficients": [
          {
            "ci_high": -0.17645418569832133,
            "ci_low": -0.4479975648598276,
            "coef": -0.31222587527907447,
            "p": 0.00001297028928131714,
            "se": 0.06855606261484216,
            "t": -4.554314576570776,
            "term": "Intercept"
          },
          {
            "ci_high": 0.9082842734581125,
            "ci_low": 0.41247864009505597,
            "coef": 0.6603814567765842,
            "p": 6.152843299974919e-7,
            "se": 0.12517514568238694,
            "t": 5.2756595822321035,
            "term": "d.comp"
          }
        ]
      }
      Hashes SHA-256 e metadados de reprodução
      Digests dos dados
      face_margin 4e22178635b245e6c5ef97a118af1ff85fd434bfb578c46c3be31387e7657ee8
      sha256 do resultado
      36796479215316d5e697dcfbc84d5c50fc30704a437a9d72ebfb943a313f1b60
    7. 6Turno do modelo
      call_7cde8b0freferenceFim: tool_use0 ms0 de entrada · 0 de saída · 0 de raciocínio · 0 em cache
      Chamadas pedidas
      • submit_answer (meta-ferramenta)
        {
          "answer": "Estimativa (infer.ols): coef.d.comp = 0,6604. Caminho de referência inferido à mão.",
          "caveats": [],
          "figure_refs": [
            "call_736e4030:coef.d.comp"
          ]
        }
    8. 7Guarda
      resposta aceita
      Números encontrados
      0,6604
      Sem lastro
      —
      Não citados
      —
      1 nova(s) tentativa(s) restante(s)
    9. 8Resposta

      Estimativa (infer.ols): coef.d.comp = 0,6604. Caminho de referência inferido à mão.

      Figuras citadas: call_736e4030:coef.d.comp · Parada: answered
      Figura da resposta: call_736e4030:coef.d.comp = 0,6603810.6603814567765842 (se 0,1251750.12517514568238694)
    10. 9Pontuação
      #0resposta com lastropassouobrigatóriaevery number backed
    11. 10Pontuação
      #1figura da resposta próximapassouobrigatória0.66 in (0.6402, 0.6798)?

    Épocas × verificações

    Resultado de cada verificação em cada época pontuada
    #01
    Época 1passoupassou

    Tentativas

    Cada tentativa é seu próprio arquivo e é publicada; só a última de cada época é pontuada.

    Downloads desta tarefa

    Pacote da tarefa (.zip)
    53,4 KB · sha256 14237aea517c5743bbc24dc1254a0cbdbc6b0a387923f713062526d428d160bc

    O hash de um zip é só de transporte: o que ancora a integridade é o RUN_SHA256SUMS que vai dentro dele, cópia exata do SHA256SUMS da execução.

    Downloads desta tarefa
    ArquivoTamanhosha256
    attachments/2387ffccb26195063df534f6a6889564cb05443a4160e3ee7e676b77083f101b.json981 B2387ffccb26195063df534f6a6889564cb05443a4160e3ee7e676b77083f101b
    attachments/393e07da80495e327d1f3b3c857050aac6782e11bec323bbeeabca30d2573dbc.json290 B393e07da80495e327d1f3b3c857050aac6782e11bec323bbeeabca30d2573dbc
    attachments/433a6877aa6a378bbd4b7e2752e484d8cb7499c562d68222be231f62ff2fa420.json2,4 KB433a6877aa6a378bbd4b7e2752e484d8cb7499c562d68222be231f62ff2fa420
    attachments/4ddbd217af32f1e3ddb3eba35bf5df7515b6ad517ba60e3084fbd9b0edabeba8.json2,4 KB4ddbd217af32f1e3ddb3eba35bf5df7515b6ad517ba60e3084fbd9b0edabeba8
    attachments/52ab03d8ec104abb85572294bf8a469d75c5de9e74d6042caabff8017adc572b.json64,0 KB52ab03d8ec104abb85572294bf8a469d75c5de9e74d6042caabff8017adc572b
    attachments/679bacfa865670a2d2b9becae0b02eefed38a428ec9887d626ed4acecb0fdf30.json875 B679bacfa865670a2d2b9becae0b02eefed38a428ec9887d626ed4acecb0fdf30
    attachments/9bfa3a55f98f9e975792853457ff5935e61b8673973d0c4ba26a352bdb14c766.json236 B9bfa3a55f98f9e975792853457ff5935e61b8673973d0c4ba26a352bdb14c766
    native/qrdata_socsci/qrdata_socsci.391.e1.a1.json458 B1c82050eab156ac768e6037a8cb45cb8f15d9edf8f1d8c57f95aee6a87d70d1f
    sources/qrdata.eval_py.json1,3 KBd610b61f390d29ce767e08ce850eab5cb0dc4d13c1edb62d8cf3b0e49a3a291a
    sources/qrdata.gold.391.json1,1 KBd568650bf8afed9d45d9da9c33d8171e5da1b1fbae7861f5c2e9f4cf2b0d8604
    specs/qrdata_socsci.391.json5,6 KB2d61da9c9f8d7618ace956eed3e0888aad9a523eebdd8b452a01f96f89e16ef8
    traces/qrdata_socsci.391.e1.a1.jsonl16,1 KB919a420964f88e837cfa6865696dcbe4d12f0725ce4f9e482649030066f16d8e
    trajectories/qrdata_socsci.391.e1.a1.jsonl12,3 KB653a3e08e78a363f38cbf15633f62b1384470f090b05b3f1e60d42f060fa34d8