Tarefa causcibench_real.q113

Veredito

Pergunta feita ao analista

How does dismissing tainted ministers affect presidential approval?

Como o agente resolveu e como foi validado

Resumo passo a passo do que o agente executou, por que o caminho está correto e como cada verificação conferiu o resultado.

1. 1Preparação da base de dados
   gonzalez_blame_shifting— This dataset comes from a comprehensive archival review of Latin American governments spanning multiple decades. It combines digitized historical records, semi-supervised machine learning to classify calls for ministerial resignation, and survey-based presidential approval estimates to study the corrective effects of ministerial dismissals on presidential popularity. The dataset includes quarterly observations and political, economic, and institutional covariates to analyze blame-shifting dynamics in presidential systems. Variables: country: Name of the country corresponding to the quarterly observation honeymoon_1q: Dummy indicating the first quarter of a newly inaugurated presidential term (1 = yes; 0 = no) honeymoon_2q: Dummy indicating the second quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no) honeymoon_3q: Dummy indicating the third quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no) preelection_1q: Dummy indicating one quarter before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no) preelection_2q: Dummy indicating two quarters before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no) dismissal_tainted: Number of ministers dismissed after receiving calls for resignation age: Average age of all cabinet members at the end of the quarter nonpartisan: Proportion of ministers in the cabinet who are not affiliated with any political party inflation: Quarterly inflation rate (World Bank) gdp: Gross domestic product metric (World Bank) allhouse: Binary indicator whether president's party holds absolute majority in legislative houses (1 = yes; 0 = no) govfrac: Index measuring probability two government deputies belong to different parties (0-1) reelect_last_year: Binary indicating if president could run for re-election in last year of term (1 = yes; 0 = no) coalition: Binary indicating presence of multi-party governing coalition (1 = yes; 0 = no) lagged_approval: Prior quarter's smoothed presidential approval estimate approval: Smoothed quarterly presidential approval measure (current quarter) lagged_rc: Aggregate number of calls for resignation received by any cabinet member in previous quarter lagged_dism_tainted: Number of tainted ministers dismissed in previous quarter lagged_age: Average age of cabinet members in previous quarter lagged_nonpartisan: Proportion of nonpartisan ministers in previous quarter's cabinet visibility: Binary indicating whether calls for resignation concerned high-visibility topics (1 = yes; 0 = no) qtr: Unique identifier for each quarterly observation (YYYYqN)
2. 2Conferência de lastro e resposta final

   Todos os 0 números escritos na resposta foram conferidos contra as ferramentas e o enunciado (nenhum número sem lastro).

   • ✓
     #0resposta com lastro

     every number in the answer was stated by a tool call
   • ✗
     #1figura da resposta próxima

     CauSciBench effect accuracy: |answer figure − gold| ≤ 5% of |gold|

Valores esperados e de onde vêm

Verificações

Caminho de referência e caminho do agente

A chamada de referência ao lado da chamada que deu a resposta, argumento por argumento.

Nenhum caminho de referência registrado para esta tarefa.

Trajetória

Cada evento na ordem em que aconteceu: turnos do modelo, chamadas de ferramentas, guardas, transformações e pontuação.

1. 0Início

   How does dismissing tainted ministers affect presidential approval?

   gonzalez_blame_shifting (agent)

   This dataset comes from a comprehensive archival review of Latin American governments spanning multiple decades. It combines digitized historical records, semi-supervised machine learning to classify calls for ministerial resignation, and survey-based presidential approval estimates to study the corrective effects of ministerial dismissals on presidential popularity. The dataset includes quarterly observations and political, economic, and institutional covariates to analyze blame-shifting dynamics in presidential systems. Variables: country: Name of the country corresponding to the quarterly observation honeymoon_1q: Dummy indicating the first quarter of a newly inaugurated presidential term (1 = yes; 0 = no) honeymoon_2q: Dummy indicating the second quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no) honeymoon_3q: Dummy indicating the third quarter of a presidential term's honeymoon period (1 = yes; 0 = no) preelection_1q: Dummy indicating one quarter before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no) preelection_2q: Dummy indicating two quarters before a scheduled presidential election (1 = yes; 0 = no) dismissal_tainted: Number of ministers dismissed after receiving calls for resignation age: Average age of all cabinet members at the end of the quarter nonpartisan: Proportion of ministers in the cabinet who are not affiliated with any political party inflation: Quarterly inflation rate (World Bank) gdp: Gross domestic product metric (World Bank) allhouse: Binary indicator whether president's party holds absolute majority in legislative houses (1 = yes; 0 = no) govfrac: Index measuring probability two government deputies belong to different parties (0-1) reelect_last_year: Binary indicating if president could run for re-election in last year of term (1 = yes; 0 = no) coalition: Binary indicating presence of multi-party governing coalition (1 = yes; 0 = no) lagged_approval: Prior quarter's smoothed presidential approval estimate approval: Smoothed quarterly presidential approval measure (current quarter) lagged_rc: Aggregate number of calls for resignation received by any cabinet member in previous quarter lagged_dism_tainted: Number of tainted ministers dismissed in previous quarter lagged_age: Average age of cabinet members in previous quarter lagged_nonpartisan: Proportion of nonpartisan ministers in previous quarter's cabinet visibility: Binary indicating whether calls for resignation concerned high-visibility topics (1 = yes; 0 = no) qtr: Unique identifier for each quarterly observation (YYYYqN)

   file 608c8167bc620dbb0e614d2a37512458559440537c20ad401d25603915e7727b · frame —
2. 1Turno do modelo
   call_861dc297rules-1Fim: tool_use0 ms0 de entrada · 0 de saída · 0 de raciocínio · 0 em cache

   Chamadas pedidas

   • submit_answer (meta-ferramenta)

     {
       "answer": "Pelas regras deste roteador não identifiquei um desenho que responda à pergunta; nenhuma estimativa foi feita.",
       "caveats": [],
       "figure_refs": []
     }

   Mensagens (formato neutro)Instruções do sistemaFerramentas oferecidas
3. 2Guarda
   resposta aceita

   Números encontrados

   —

   Sem lastro

   —

   Não citados

   —

   1 nova(s) tentativa(s) restante(s)
4. 3Resposta

   Pelas regras deste roteador não identifiquei um desenho que responda à pergunta; nenhuma estimativa foi feita.

   Figuras citadas: — · Parada: answered
5. 4Pontuação
   #0resposta com lastropassouobrigatóriaevery number backed
6. 5Pontuação
   #1figura da resposta próximafalhouobrigatóriano answer figure: the answer cites no effect of an estimator call

Épocas × verificações

Tentativas

Cada tentativa é seu próprio arquivo e é publicada; só a última de cada época é pontuada.

• época 1, tentativa 1falhoupontuada(exibindo)

Downloads desta tarefa