Tarefa causcibench_real.q002

Veredito

Pergunta feita ao analista

Does reminding citizens about their Civic Duties make them more likely to vote?

Como o agente resolveu e como foi validado

Resumo passo a passo do que o agente executou, por que o caminho está correto e como cada verificação conferiu o resultado.

1. 1Preparação da base de dados
   gerber_social_pressure— The randomized experiment aims to analyze the effect of different types of social pressures on voter behavior. A field experiment was conducted in Michigan ahead of the August 2006 primary election. Households were randomly assigned to a control group or one of four treatment groups: Civic Duty, Hawthorne, Self, Neighbors. Eleven days before the election, each treatment group received a different mailing: Civic Duty: Emphasized the recipient's responsibility as a citizen to vote. Hawthorne: Notified recipients that their voting behavior would be studied using public records, introducing mild social pressure. Self: Listed the voting history of all registered voters in the household and noted that an updated chart would be mailed after the election. Neighbors: Included both the household's and neighbors' voting records, implying public exposure of voting behavior. Control Group: Received no mailing. Variables in the Dataset: sex: Participant's sex (male or female) g2000, g2002, g2004: Voted in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 gubernatorial elections p2000, p2002, p2004: Voted in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 primary elections treatment: Assigned group (Civic Duty, Hawthorne, Neighbors, Self, or Control) cluster: Cluster identifier for the unit voted: Indicator for voting in the 2006 primary election hh_id: Household ID hh_size: Number of individuals in the household yob: Year of birth of the participant
2. 2Conferência de lastro e resposta final

   Todos os 0 números escritos na resposta foram conferidos contra as ferramentas e o enunciado (nenhum número sem lastro).

   • ✓
     #0resposta com lastro

     every number in the answer was stated by a tool call
   • ✗
     #1figura da resposta próxima

     CauSciBench effect accuracy: |answer figure − gold| ≤ 5% of |gold|

Valores esperados e de onde vêm

Verificações

Caminho de referência e caminho do agente

A chamada de referência ao lado da chamada que deu a resposta, argumento por argumento.

Nenhum caminho de referência registrado para esta tarefa.

Trajetória

Cada evento na ordem em que aconteceu: turnos do modelo, chamadas de ferramentas, guardas, transformações e pontuação.

1. 0Início

   Does reminding citizens about their Civic Duties make them more likely to vote?

   gerber_social_pressure (agent)

   The randomized experiment aims to analyze the effect of different types of social pressures on voter behavior. A field experiment was conducted in Michigan ahead of the August 2006 primary election. Households were randomly assigned to a control group or one of four treatment groups: Civic Duty, Hawthorne, Self, Neighbors. Eleven days before the election, each treatment group received a different mailing: Civic Duty: Emphasized the recipient's responsibility as a citizen to vote. Hawthorne: Notified recipients that their voting behavior would be studied using public records, introducing mild social pressure. Self: Listed the voting history of all registered voters in the household and noted that an updated chart would be mailed after the election. Neighbors: Included both the household's and neighbors' voting records, implying public exposure of voting behavior. Control Group: Received no mailing. Variables in the Dataset: sex: Participant's sex (male or female) g2000, g2002, g2004: Voted in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 gubernatorial elections p2000, p2002, p2004: Voted in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 primary elections treatment: Assigned group (Civic Duty, Hawthorne, Neighbors, Self, or Control) cluster: Cluster identifier for the unit voted: Indicator for voting in the 2006 primary election hh_id: Household ID hh_size: Number of individuals in the household yob: Year of birth of the participant

   file bac3dfd61a4d09fd0e2256db8bac088ae6054b9e05990609b86665dceec9b6e8 · frame —
2. 1Turno do modelo
   call_9e9e3098naive-olsFim: tool_use0 ms0 de entrada · 0 de saída · 0 de raciocínio · 0 em cache

   Chamadas pedidas

   • submit_answer (meta-ferramenta)

     {
       "answer": "Linha de base ingênua: o item não declara o resultado e o tratamento, então não há regressão ingênua a fazer e nenhuma estimativa é citada.",
       "caveats": [],
       "figure_refs": []
     }

   Mensagens (formato neutro)Instruções do sistemaFerramentas oferecidas
3. 2Guarda
   resposta aceita

   Números encontrados

   —

   Sem lastro

   —

   Não citados

   —

   1 nova(s) tentativa(s) restante(s)
4. 3Resposta

   Linha de base ingênua: o item não declara o resultado e o tratamento, então não há regressão ingênua a fazer e nenhuma estimativa é citada.

   Figuras citadas: — · Parada: answered
5. 4Pontuação
   #0resposta com lastropassouobrigatóriaevery number backed
6. 5Pontuação
   #1figura da resposta próximafalhouobrigatóriano answer figure: the answer cites no effect of an estimator call

Épocas × verificações

Tentativas

Cada tentativa é seu próprio arquivo e é publicada; só a última de cada época é pontuada.

• época 1, tentativa 1falhoupontuada(exibindo)

Downloads desta tarefa