Conditional cash transfer and informality in Brazil
Ana Luiza Neves de Holanda Barbosa e outros, 2014 · IZA Journal of Labor & Development
Bolsa Familia reduced hours in the informal sector by about two hours, but the estimate is not significant at conventional levels. Occupational choice (Table 4) shows no clear effect either.
Estimativa · Hours worked in the informal sector, local treatment effect
-2,01 [-4,41; 0,393]
hours (unit as in the table; not restated in the table extract) · calculado a partir do erro-padrão
p: not significant at 5% (no stars)
- Desenho
- Regression discontinuity on child age (local average treatment effect), optimal bandwidth
- População
- Households receiving Bolsa Familia near the child-age eligibility cutoff, 2006 PNAD
Onde está o número
Table 3, total sample, article tables page; 2006 PNAD
Contexto
What varies: the child-age cutoff that sets eligibility, so households just either side of it are compared. Limits: a local effect for households near the cutoff, from one 2006 survey; the bandwidth is chosen from the data, and the estimate is not significant.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaTransferências, subsídios e financiamento
- TipoTransferências de renda
- TipoMudança em programa de transferência
- ResultadoEmprego formal
- EixoRenda e trabalho
MAGI simula este instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- Brazil · País · BR
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Revisado