Assessing the impact of CHARM2, a family planning program on gender attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality in India
Sangeeta Chatterji e outros, 2024 · PLOS Global Public Health
Five sessions of gender equity and family planning counselling for couples produced no statistically significant effect on women's reported physical intimate partner violence at 18 months.
Estimativa · past-9-month physical intimate partner violence, adjusted odds ratio
1,73 [0,870; 3,46]
adjusted odds ratio
p: 0.12
- Desenho
- Experimento aleatório por conglomerados. two-arm cluster RCT across 20 health subcentre catchment areas
- População
- young married couples with wives aged 18–29 in rural Junnar block, Pune district, Maharashtra, India, surveyed at baseline and 18-month follow-up (2018–2020)
- Amostra
- 1.087 · couples completing the 18-month follow-up survey
Onde está o número
Results > IPV; Results section 'IPV', second paragraph; and Table 2, row 'Physical violence (women), % yes', 18-month outcome
In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the experience of physical IPV between the intervention and control groups over time (aOR at 9 months: 1.33, C.I.: 0.60, 2.98; aOR at 18 months: 1.73, C.I.: 0.87, 3.46).
Contexto
What changed: Couples received CHARM2, five sessions of gender equity and family planning counselling delivered separately to husbands and wives followed by a joint session. Comparison: Couples receiving routine standard health and family planning care. Limits: Low baseline prevalence of IPV in the study area may have caused floor effects, and 18-month data collection was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaInformação e persuasão
- TipoCapacitação e aconselhamento
- MecanismoInformação, contato e atitudes sociais
- EixoIgualdade de gênero
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- India · País · IN
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23