Treatment effects beyond the mean using distributional regression: Methods and guidance
Maike Hohberg e outros, 2020 · PLoS ONE
Progresa cash transfers had no statistically significant effect on conditional food consumption inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient across all households in treated villages.
Estimativa · marginal effect on conditional Gini coefficient of food consumption
0,00700 [-0,00600; 0,0210]
change in Gini coefficient (0-1 scale)
- Desenho
- Experimento aleatório por conglomerados. Cluster RCT with village-level randomization, estimated via GAMLSS with Singh-Maddala distribution
- População
- Rural households in treatment and control villages in Mexico, November 1999
- Amostra
- 14.740 · households
Onde está o número
Table 4, row 'ME on Gini coefficient'
ME on Gini coefficient | 0.007 | -0.006 | 0.021
Contexto
What changed: Poor households in treatment villages received conditional cash transfers under Mexico's Progresa program. Comparison: All households (eligible and ineligible) in treatment villages versus control villages. Limits: Measures conditional food consumption inequality derived from a parametric distributional regression model (GAMLSS) rather than overall unconditional income inequality.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaTransferências, subsídios e financiamento
- TipoTransferências de renda
- MecanismoIncidência direta de transferências e impostos diretos
- ResultadoDesigualdade
- EixoEquidade social
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- Mexico · País · MX
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23