Pular para o conteúdo
Voltar à lista
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoBase de evidências do MAGI

Peer support intervention (ABA-feed) to improve breastfeeding: UK based, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial

Kate Jolly e outros, 2026 · The BMJ

Universal proactive, assets-based infant feeding peer support (ABA-feed) did not improve any breastfeeding rates at eight weeks postpartum compared with usual care (risk difference 0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.04).

Estimativa · any breastfeeding at 8 weeks, risk difference

0,0100 [-0,0300; 0,0400]

risk difference

P=0.69

Desenho
Experimento aleatório. Multicentre randomised controlled trial across 17 UK localities
População
2475 nulliparous pregnant women in 17 UK localities, 2022-2024
Amostra
2.467 · women with primary outcome data (1452 intervention, 1015 usual care)

Onde está o número

Results > Breastfeeding outcomes; Results, subsection 'Breastfeeding outcomes', first paragraph and Table 3

Trecho do estudo
Rates of any breastfeeding at eight weeks (primary outcome) were similar between the intervention group and usual care group (69.8% v 68.8%; risk difference 0.01, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.04, P=0.69; intracluster correlation coefficient 0.036)

Contexto

What changed: Women received universal, proactive peer support antenatally and up to eight weeks postnatally, including frequent contact in the first two weeks. Comparison: Usual care comprising universal NHS midwife and health visitor support plus reactive local feeding services. Limits: The study sample had high educational attainment and strong baseline motivation to breastfeed; recruitment achieved 80% rather than 90% power.

Caminho no grafo

  1. FamíliaInformação e persuasão
  2. TipoCapacitação e aconselhamento
  3. EixoSaúde

MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento

Lugares do estudo

  • United Kingdom · País · GB
Licença
CC-BY
Revisão
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23