Accommodation‐based interventions for individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness
Ciara Keenan e outros, 2021 · Campbell Systematic Reviews
High-support unconditional accommodation interventions significantly improved housing stability by 0.62 standard deviations compared to no intervention.
Estimativa · Housing stability, standardised mean difference (Hedges' g)
0,620 [0,190; 1,06]
standardised mean difference (Hedges' g)
- Desenho
- Meta-análise. Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies
- População
- Individuals experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness in high-income countries (primarily the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom)
Onde está o número
RESULTS > Effects of interventions > Housing stability > Network meta‐analysis; Section 'RESULTS > Effects of interventions > Housing stability > Network meta‐analysis', item 2
Interventions classified as high support and unconditional resulted in greater housing stability than no intervention. The effect size describing this difference is 0.62 (95% CI [0.19, 1.06]).
Contexto
What changed: Individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness received unconditional accommodation combined with high, individualized support services. Comparison: Compared to no intervention in a frequentist network meta-analysis. Limits: Confidence intervals remain relatively wide, primary studies had mixed methodological quality, and evidence is heavily concentrated in North America.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaProvisão direta
- TipoProvisão de serviço público
- EixoMoradia
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- United States · País · US
- Canada · País · CA
- United Kingdom · País · GB
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23