Pular para o conteúdo
Voltar à lista
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoBase de evidências do MAGI

Did private election administration funding advantage Democrats in 2020?

Apoorva Lal e outros, 2024 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

CTCL private election administration grants in 2020 increased county voter turnout by an estimated 0.03 percentage points, statistically indistinguishable from zero.

Estimativa · presidential election voter turnout, percentage points

0,0300 [-0,225; 0,285]

percentage points · calculado a partir do erro-padrão

Desenho
Diferenças em diferenças. Synthetic difference-in-differences using county and year weights across 8 presidential elections (1992–2020)
População
2,594 US counties in presidential elections from 1992 to 2020
Amostra
20.752 · county-election observations across 2,594 counties

Onde está o número

Table 2.; Table 2, row 'Grant recipient in 2020', column (8)

Trecho do estudo
Grant recipient in 2020 | 3.26 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.14 | −0.03 | 0.03 | (0.35) | (0.11) | (0.12) | (0.10) | (0.21) | (0.13) | (0.15) | (0.13)

Contexto

What changed: CTCL distributed roughly $350 million in private grants to local election administrators during the 2020 election. Comparison: Grant-receiving counties compared to non-recipient counties via synthetic difference-in-differences. Limits: Excludes ten states with municipal election administration and very small or border-shifting counties.

Caminho no grafo

  1. FamíliaOutro instrumento
  2. ResultadoParticipação social nas decisões
  3. EixoVoz política

MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento

Lugares do estudo

  • United States · País · US
Licença
CC-BY
Revisão
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23