Pular para o conteúdo
Voltar à lista
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoBase de evidências do MAGI

Cost-effectiveness of Housing First Intervention With Intensive Case Management Compared With Treatment as Usual for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness

Eric A. Latimer e outros, 2019 · JAMA Network Open

Housing First with Intensive Case Management increased stable housing by 140.34 days per year compared with treatment as usual among homeless adults with mental illness.

Estimativa · Annualized days of stable housing, days per year

140,3 [128,1; 153,3]

days per year

Desenho
Experimento aleatório. Multi-site randomized controlled trial across four Canadian cities
População
Homeless adults with mental illness and moderate support needs in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, and Montreal, Canada (2009–2011)
Amostra
1.160 · participants with usable data

Onde está o número

Results, fifth paragraph

Trecho do estudo
Days with stable housing were higher by 140.34 (95% CI, 128.14-153.31) days in the HF group, with a cost difference of $7867.73 (95% CI, $4408.81-$11 404.79).

Contexto

What changed: Participants received scattered-site rent subsidies and recovery-oriented intensive case management. Comparison: Treatment as usual, retaining access to standard emergency shelters and community services. Limits: Housing status relies on self-reported residential time-line follow-back; follow-up was limited to 24 months; participants and interviewers could not be blinded.

Caminho no grafo

  1. FamíliaProvisão direta
  2. TipoProvisão de serviço público
  3. EixoMoradia

MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento

Lugares do estudo

  • Vancouver · Município · CA
  • Winnipeg · Município · CA
  • Toronto · Município · CA
  • Montreal · Município · CA
Licença
CC-BY
Revisão
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23