Adding rewards to regulation: The impacts of watershed conservation on land cover and household wellbeing in Moyobamba, Peru
Javier Montoya-Zumaeta e outros, 2019 · PLoS ONE
Enrolment in the PES-ICDP conservation package increased preserved primary forest by 0.204 ha per plot over 2010–2016 compared to matched control plots.
Estimativa · Change in primary forest cover, ha per plot
0,204 [0,0703; 0,338]
ha/plot · calculado a partir do erro-padrão
p: ***
- Desenho
- Pareamento. Kernel propensity score matching with post-matching bias-adjusted regression
- População
- Farming plots in the upper micro-watersheds of Moyobamba, Peru, observed between 2010 and 2016
- Amostra
- 485 · plots (51 enrolled in T2, 42 under T1, and 392 non-treated controls)
Onde está o número
Table 3, under 'T2 (PES–ICDP mix) vs control', row 'Marginal effect' following 'Kernel PS (K-PS)', column 'Δ Primary forest'
Marginal effectb | 0.204*** (0.0682)
Contexto
What changed: Farmers in strategic drinking water micro-watersheds received conditional in-kind rewards, temporary land tenure, and agroforestry support alongside municipal protected area rules. Comparison: Matched control plots from surrounding sectors outside the protected zone. Limits: Baseline deforestation pressure fell due to a local coffee rust epidemic; funding shortages led to irregular reward disbursement after 2015.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaInstrumentos de mercado e direitos
- TipoPagamento por serviços ambientais
- MecanismoFiscalização e condicionalidade ambiental
- ResultadoDesmatamento
- EixoConversão de terras
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- Peru · País · PE
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23