Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Heather Menzies Munthe‐Kaas e outros, 2018 · Campbell Systematic Reviews
High-intensity case management reduced the risk of being homeless at 12 to 18 months by 41% compared to usual services in a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Estimativa · relative risk of being homeless at 12–18 month follow-up
0,590 [0,410; 0,870]
risk ratio
- Desenho
- Meta-análise. random-effects meta-analysis of 3 RCTs
- População
- Homeless or at-risk adults, primarily with mental illness or substance abuse issues, in the US and UK
Onde está o número
Results > Category 1: Case management > Category 1.A: High intensity case management > 1.A.1. High intensity case management compared to usual services > Primary outcome: Homelessness; Results > Category 1.A.1 > Primary outcome: Homelessness
As evident from the forest plot (Figure 6), the pooled analysis indicates that high intensity case management probably leads to fewer individuals who report being homeless at the 12 to 18 month follow‐up interview compared to usual services (RR=0.59, 95%CI=0.41 to 0.87).
Contexto
What changed: High-intensity case management (such as Assertive Community Treatment or Intensive Case Management) was provided to homeless or at-risk adults. Comparison: Usual social and shelter services available in the community. Limits: High risk of bias in primary studies due to lack of blinding and incomplete reporting, though GRADE certainty for this outcome was rated moderate.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaProvisão direta
- TipoProvisão de serviço público
- EixoMoradia
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- United States · País · US
- United Kingdom · País · GB
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23