Potential of different area-based governance mechanisms for achieving Global Biodiversity Framework goals
Pablo J Negret e outros, 2026 · Nature Communications
Strict protected areas (IUCN categories I and II) in the Peruvian Amazon avoided 60% of expected forest loss between 2005 and 2021 relative to matched control pixels.
Estimativa · Avoided forest loss as a share of expected loss, %
60,0
% of expected forest loss avoided
O estudo não informa intervalo.
- Desenho
- Pareamento. Propensity score matching at 30 m pixel resolution
- População
- Forest pixels in protected areas (IUCN categories I and II) and matched unprotected control areas in the Peruvian Amazon, 2005–2021
Onde está o número
Results > Impact of the different governance mechanisms on forest and carbon emissions; Results section, subsection 'Impact of the different governance mechanisms on forest and carbon emissions', first paragraph
PAs were the most effective in preventing forest loss with those in categories I and II having a higher effectiveness than those in categories III and VI (avoiding 60 and 49% of expected loss, respectively).
Contexto
What changed: Legal designation and management of strict protected areas (IUCN categories I and II) established prior to 2005. Comparison: Unprotected forested pixels matched on biophysical, accessibility, and pre-2005 deforestation trend covariates. Limits: Pixel matching does not capture site-level management capacity or governance differences; non-matched leakage beyond buffers remains possible.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaRegras e regulação
- TipoÁreas protegidas
- ResultadoDesmatamento
- EixoConversão de terras
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- Peru · País · PE
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23