Conservation performance of different conservation governance regimes in the Peruvian Amazon
Judith Schleicher e outros, 2017 · Scientific Reports
State protected areas in the Peruvian Amazon avoided an estimated median of 0.40 percentage points of deforestation between 2006 and 2011 compared to matched unprotected areas.
Estimativa · avoided deforestation, percentage points
0,400
percentage points
O estudo não informa intervalo.
p < 0.05
- Desenho
- Pareamento. Propensity score matching comparing protected areas to matched unprotected land
- População
- 30 state protected areas across the Peruvian Amazon, 2006–2011
- Amostra
- 30 · state protected areas
Onde está o número
Results > Conservation performance of different forest conservation governance regimes; Results, subsection 'Conservation performance of different forest conservation governance regimes', paragraph 1
Meanwhile, CCs on average avoided twice as much deforestation (median: 0.99%) and forest degradation (1.53%) than state PAs (deforestation: 0.40%; degradation: 0.72%), and slightly more than ITs (deforestation: 0.95%; degradation: 1.37%).
Contexto
What changed: Designation and management of state protected areas in place by 2006. Comparison: Unprotected forest pixels matched via propensity scores on accessibility, topography, and socioeconomic pressure covariates. Limits: Matching controls only for observable covariates and excludes areas with cloud cover or high spatial mismatch.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaRegras e regulação
- TipoÁreas protegidas
- ResultadoDesmatamento
- EixoConversão de terras
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- Peru · País · PE
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23