Pular para o conteúdo
Voltar à lista
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoBase de evidências do MAGI

Conservation benefits of a large marine protected area network that spans multiple ecosystems

Joshua G Smith e outros, 2025 · Conservation Biology

Statewide implementation of no-take MPAs across California increased the biomass of targeted fish species relative to fished reference areas (effect size = 0.497, p < 0.001).

Estimativa · log response ratio of biomass (inside vs. outside MPA)

0,497

log response ratio

O estudo não informa intervalo.

p < 0.001

Desenho
Meta-análise. Meta-analytic synthesis of paired inside-versus-outside MPA monitoring surveys
População
59 marine protected areas across surf zone, kelp forest, shallow reef, and deep reef ecosystems in California, United States, monitored between 2007 and 2020
Amostra
59 · marine protected areas

Onde está o número

RESULTS > Network‐wide performance; Section 'RESULTS > Network‐wide performance', first paragraph

Trecho do estudo
targeted (i.e., fished) fish biomass was positively associated with regulatory protection and was significantly greater inside no‐take MPAs compared with areas that allowed take (effect size [E.S.] = 0.497, p < 0.001)

Contexto

What changed: Establishment of fully protected no-take marine reserves across multiple marine ecosystems. Comparison: Paired reference areas open to commercial and recreational fishing. Limits: Observational paired survey design across heterogeneous ecosystems with varying gear types, historical fishing pressure, and potential spatial selection effects.

Caminho no grafo

  1. FamíliaRegras e regulação
  2. TipoÁreas protegidas
  3. EixoAcidificação dos oceanos

MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento

Lugares do estudo

  • California · Estado ou região · US
Licença
CC-BY
Revisão
Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23