Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Juliet A Usher-Smith e outros, 2018 · BMJ Open
Providing personalized cancer risk information did not change cancer screening attendance across 12 randomized trials (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03).
Estimativa · screening attendance, relative risk
1,02 [0,980; 1,03]
relative risk
- Desenho
- Meta-análise. Random-effects meta-analysis of 12 randomised controlled trials
- População
- Adults without a prior history of cancer from the general population in the UK and USA
Onde está o número
Results > Attendance at screening; Results, subsection 'Attendance at screening', paragraph 1
all showed no effect of the risk-based interventions as shown in the meta-analysis (figure 2) with a combined RR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.03, I2 61.6%).
Contexto
What changed: Delivery of individualized cancer risk estimates calculated using multifactorial risk tools alongside prevention advice. Comparison: Generic cancer educational materials, usual care, or delayed intervention. Limits: Substantial heterogeneity across cancer types (breast, colorectal, cervical) and intervention delivery modes, with several trials relying on self-reported attendance.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaInformação e persuasão
- TipoCampanha de informação
- EixoSaúde
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- United Kingdom · País · GB
- United States · País · US
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23