An Analysis of the Impact of the Emissions Trading System on the Green Total Factor Productivity Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Approach: The Case of China
Susheng Wang e outros, 2021 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
China's pilot emissions trading system significantly increased urban green total factor productivity by 0.662 index points in pilot cities.
Estimativa · GTFP index measured by SBM-ML directional distance function
0,662
index points
O estudo não informa intervalo.
p < 0.01
- Desenho
- Diferenças em diferenças. Spatial difference-in-differences Durbin model (SDID-SDM)
- População
- 281 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2003 to 2017
- Amostra
- 3.934 · city-year observations
Onde está o número
Table 1, column (2), row 'DID'
DID | 0.491 *** | 0.662 ***
Contexto
What changed: China launched national-level emissions trading system pilots across 11 provinces in 2007 to establish market-based quota trading for major pollutants. Comparison: 109 pilot cities compared with 172 non-pilot cities over 2003-2017 using a spatial difference-in-differences model. Limits: Effects depend on subnational marketization and environmental enforcement intensity, and GTFP is a composite efficiency index rather than direct emissions tonnage.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaInstrumentos de mercado e direitos
- TipoLicenças negociáveis
- MecanismoAbatimento de emissões poluentes
- EixoPoluição do ar
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- China · País · CN
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23