Paired assistance and poverty alleviation: Experience and evidence from China
Quanzhong Wang e outros, 2024 · PLOS ONE
Governmental paired assistance was associated with a 7.8 percentage point lower probability of exiting poverty compared to assistance from social organizations.
Estimativa · probability of escaping poverty (marginal effect, 0-1)
-0,0780 [-0,119; -0,0372]
marginal effect on probability (0-1) · calculado a partir do erro-padrão
p: ***
- Desenho
- Diferenças em diferenças. PSM-DID using caliper propensity score matching
- População
- Registered poor households in B Town, W County, Anhui Province, China, 2016–2019
- Amostra
- 7.964 · household-year observations across 4 waves after matching
Onde está o número
Table 4, row 'Governmental assistance subjects × T', column (4)
Governmental assistance subjects × T | -0.0541***(0.0205) | -0.0819***(0.0209) | -0.0507**(0.0206) | -0.0780***(0.0208)
Contexto
What changed: Poor households were assigned to government entities rather than social actors for targeted pairing support. Comparison: Registered poor households paired with government versus social actors before and after assistance rollout. Limits: Confined to one township in Anhui Province; government partners disproportionately handled more severely disadvantaged 'five-guarantee' households.
Caminho no grafo
- FamíliaProvisão direta
- TipoProvisão de serviço público
- ResultadoPobreza
- EixoEquidade social
MAGI só cita evidência deste instrumento
Lugares do estudo
- China · País · CN
- Licença
- CC-BY
- Revisão
- Extraído por máquina, não revisadoExtraído por: gemini-3.8-flash, 2026-10-23